Discussion about this post

User's avatar
VG's avatar

Thank you for this article. I was a faculty member at Bluefield State under Capeharts Reign. His practices of no shared governance almost lost our HLC accreditation which would have shut down our institution. We provide an education to a largley underserved region. Without accreditation, we would have lost federal aid. So thanks to the faculty who fought tooth and nail to correct this tyranny, the University is still standing and moving toward a much much brighter future.

Expand full comment
John Krygier's avatar

I understand the problem with administrators and their tendency for soul-less, bottom-line thinking. But faculty are not necessarily innocent. Where I (as a faculty member) draw the line is when the "oppositional" faculty are not fighting the fight for the students, or the institution, but for their own self interests. They want to teach the same courses in the same way they did 30 years ago, despite dropping course enrollment and mediocre evaluations. They don't want to do much research, which is reflected in the declining quality of their courses. They don't want to engage in college initiatives that students see as top priority (research, internships, travel, etc.).

It can actually be a good time for faculty in higher ed., if you are creative, innovative, engaged with the students, willing to think outside of the box, preserving what is good about higher ed. in a new and flexible manner. I've found that administrators are open to engaging and negotiating in this context. And the outcomes can be good when higher ed is not us versus them.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts